CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots CRWrnafold
MCC 0.534 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.157 > 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.481 > 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.599 > 0.540
Total TP 208 > 177
Total TN 55079 < 55098
Total FP 157 < 167
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 18
Total FP INCONS 120 < 133
Total FP COMP 18 > 16
Total FN 224 < 255
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 55079
Total FP 157
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 224
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.599
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.27 0.29 9 6185 23 3 19 1 24
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 177
Total TN 55098
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 133
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 255
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.