CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots Fold
MCC 0.535 > 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.532 ± 0.067 > 0.498 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.603 > 0.570
Total TP 1191 > 1107
Total TN 544476 < 544509
Total FP 864 < 936
Total FP CONTRA 110 > 92
Total FP INCONS 674 < 743
Total FP COMP 80 < 101
Total FN 1305 < 1389
P-value 3.85233844192e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Fold).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1191
Total TN 544476
Total FP 864
Total FP CONTRA 110
Total FP INCONS 674
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 1305
Total Scores
MCC 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.532 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.603
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.34 0.29 0.42 5 1641 7 1 6 0 12
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.79 0.74 0.85 28 4153 5 0 5 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60617 81 22 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.55 62 70763 52 10 41 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.27 0.29 9 6185 23 3 19 1 24
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 7 0 5 2 7
3J2C_M - 0.61 0.49 0.76 102 106356 38 5 28 5 105
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.49 0.74 31 10254 12 0 11 1 32
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.11 3 7476 33 2 22 9 30
3J3E_7 0.59 0.50 0.71 27 7102 11 1 10 0 27
3J3F_7 0.73 0.64 0.84 32 7222 7 0 6 1 18
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 40 3 23 14 25
3J3V_B 0.54 0.44 0.68 25 6984 12 1 11 0 32
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 4 7 1 11
3O58_3 0.23 0.26 0.21 9 12360 34 10 24 0 26
3PDR_A 0.67 0.56 0.82 40 12831 11 0 9 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.55 0.50 0.61 20 4720 14 1 12 1 20
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.19 7 9008 30 5 25 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14150 46 6 40 0 52
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.66 0.57 0.76 42 16416 18 0 13 5 32
3ZEX_D 0.78 0.67 0.92 33 6985 3 0 3 0 16
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.61 0.70 0.54 7 515 6 2 4 0 3
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 2822 4 3 1 0 7
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1107
Total TN 544509
Total FP 936
Total FP CONTRA 92
Total FP INCONS 743
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 1389
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.570
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.79 0.91 31 6071 5 0 3 2 8
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1638 15 0 15 0 17
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_a - 0.20 0.19 0.23 3 1115 10 2 8 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.15 0.23 32 106350 110 5 104 1 175
3J2C_O - 0.59 0.54 0.65 34 10244 18 1 17 0 29
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.47 0.43 0.52 12 2752 11 1 10 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.57 20 7105 15 1 14 0 34
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.28 0.28 0.29 10 12211 39 5 20 14 26
3J3V_B 0.51 0.42 0.63 24 6983 14 1 13 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.19 7 9008 30 5 25 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21890 57 2 53 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.76 0.65 0.89 48 16417 12 0 6 6 26
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.