CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Afold
MCC 0.386 > 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.157 > 0.398 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.290 < 0.312
Positive Predictive Value 0.514 > 0.389
Total TP 329 < 354
Total TN 1166544 > 1166275
Total FP 330 < 599
Total FP CONTRA 25 < 58
Total FP INCONS 286 < 497
Total FP COMP 19 < 44
Total FN 806 > 781
P-value 3.45076534967e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 329
Total TN 1166544
Total FP 330
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 286
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 806
Total Scores
MCC 0.386
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.290
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
2M58_A - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1645 1 1 0 0 10
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.82 0.67 1.00 42 10254 1 0 0 1 21
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_B - 0.27 0.18 0.40 101 1072127 154 6 146 2 457
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_H - 0.20 0.18 0.22 7 9013 25 4 21 0 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4ATO_G - 0.41 0.40 0.44 4 519 6 0 5 1 6
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.39 0.22 0.71 5 1533 2 0 2 0 18

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 1166275
Total FP 599
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 497
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 781
Total Scores
MCC 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.312
Positive Predictive Value 0.389
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.