CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.550 > 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.087 > 0.493 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.453 > 0.379
Positive Predictive Value 0.672 < 0.698
Total TP 697 > 584
Total TN 302426 < 302626
Total FP 388 > 288
Total FP CONTRA 35 > 22
Total FP INCONS 305 > 231
Total FP COMP 48 > 35
Total FN 842 < 955
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 697
Total TN 302426
Total FP 388
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 305
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 842
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
2M58_A - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1645 1 1 0 0 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.82 0.67 1.00 42 10254 1 0 0 1 21
3J2C_M - 0.54 0.42 0.69 86 106367 43 6 32 5 121
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.70 0.61 0.82 45 16416 14 1 9 4 29
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.84 0.74 0.96 23 2826 1 1 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.39 0.22 0.71 5 1533 2 0 2 0 18

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 584
Total TN 302626
Total FP 288
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 231
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 955
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.379
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1648 5 0 5 0 17
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10296 0 0 0 0 63
3J2C_M - 0.37 0.16 0.83 34 106450 8 0 7 1 173
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21914 33 1 30 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.61 0.92 45 16422 7 0 4 3 29
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.75 0.57 1.00 13 1527 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.