CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Mastr(20)
MCC 0.526 > 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.105 > 0.414 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.433 > 0.341
Positive Predictive Value 0.645 < 0.729
Total TP 342 > 269
Total TN 119795 < 119956
Total FP 223 > 108
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 6
Total FP INCONS 172 > 94
Total FP COMP 35 > 8
Total FN 448 < 521
P-value 9.95914622767e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 119795
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 172
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 448
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.645
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 269
Total TN 119956
Total FP 108
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 521
Total Scores
MCC 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.341
Positive Predictive Value 0.729
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3E_7 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 7099 10 1 9 0 23
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3J3F_7 0.72 0.64 0.82 32 7221 8 0 7 1 18
3J3V_B 0.19 0.12 0.30 7 6998 16 0 16 0 50
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZND_W -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2988 16 3 12 1 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.