CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.580 > 0.033
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.090 > 0.007 ± 0.014
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.003
Positive Predictive Value 0.709 > 0.375
Total TP 488 > 3
Total TN 144462 < 145142
Total FP 236 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 0
Total FP INCONS 180 > 5
Total FP COMP 36 > 0
Total FN 534 < 1019
P-value 4.98172311752e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 488
Total TN 144462
Total FP 236
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 180
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 534
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.84 0.74 0.96 23 2826 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3
Total TN 145142
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 1019
Total Scores
MCC 0.033
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.007 ± 0.014
Sensitivity 0.003
Positive Predictive Value 0.375
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3V_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 57
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.19 0.10 0.38 3 2842 5 0 5 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.