CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot RDfolder
MCC 0.555 > 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.139 > 0.361 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.444 > 0.302
Positive Predictive Value 0.704 > 0.550
Total TP 178 > 121
Total TN 35428 < 35461
Total FP 81 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 8
Total FP INCONS 71 < 91
Total FP COMP 6 > 4
Total FN 223 < 280
P-value 2.12160100812e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 178
Total TN 35428
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.704
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.41 0.40 0.44 4 519 6 0 5 1 6
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4JRC_A - 0.39 0.22 0.71 5 1533 2 0 2 0 18

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 35461
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 280
Total Scores
MCC 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.361 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.302
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 1525 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.