CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.492 > 0.417
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.232 > 0.405 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.396 > 0.283
Positive Predictive Value 0.617 < 0.619
Total TP 127 > 91
Total TN 60790 < 60849
Total FP 107 > 82
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 4
Total FP INCONS 66 > 52
Total FP COMP 28 > 26
Total FN 194 < 230
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 60790
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.492
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.396
Positive Predictive Value 0.617
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4JF2_A 0.84 0.74 0.96 23 2826 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 60849
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 230
Total Scores
MCC 0.417
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.405 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.283
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.