CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.606 > 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.103 > 0.589 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.505 > 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.733 > 0.700
Total TP 373 > 362
Total TN 105620 > 105612
Total FP 182 < 183
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 18
Total FP INCONS 115 < 137
Total FP COMP 46 > 28
Total FN 365 < 376
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 373
Total TN 105620
Total FP 182
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 365
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J20_0 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.54 0.42 0.71 22 7844 11 1 8 2 31
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 15 2 8 5 30
3J3E_7 0.61 0.54 0.69 29 7098 13 2 11 0 25
3J3F_8 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 12221 26 2 10 14 23
3J3F_7 0.66 0.60 0.73 30 7219 12 1 10 1 20
3J3V_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 35 6982 4 1 3 0 22
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.63 0.74 31 6979 11 2 9 0 18
3ZND_W 0.37 0.35 0.40 8 2983 15 2 10 3 15
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.44 0.70 14 3466 6 2 4 0 18

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 105612
Total FP 183
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 376
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.