CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) IPknot
MCC 0.590 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.101 > 0.529 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.486 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.720 > 0.645
Total TP 384 > 342
Total TN 119792 < 119795
Total FP 195 < 223
Total FP CONTRA 23 > 16
Total FP INCONS 126 < 172
Total FP COMP 46 > 35
Total FN 406 < 448
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 384
Total TN 119792
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 126
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 406
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.486
Positive Predictive Value 0.720
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_0 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 10
3J2L_3 0.54 0.42 0.71 22 7844 11 1 8 2 31
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 15 2 8 5 30
3J3E_7 0.61 0.54 0.69 29 7098 13 2 11 0 25
3J3F_8 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 12221 26 2 10 14 23
3J3F_7 0.66 0.60 0.73 30 7219 12 1 10 1 20
3J3V_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 35 6982 4 1 3 0 22
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.63 0.74 31 6979 11 2 9 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.21 0.46 11 14172 13 2 11 0 41
3ZND_W 0.37 0.35 0.40 8 2983 15 2 10 3 15
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.44 0.70 14 3466 6 2 4 0 18

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 119795
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 172
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 448
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.645
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.