CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.590 > 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.101 > 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.486 > 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.720 > 0.379
Total TP 384 > 259
Total TN 119792 > 119641
Total FP 195 < 467
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 53
Total FP INCONS 126 < 372
Total FP COMP 46 > 42
Total FN 406 < 531
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 384
Total TN 119792
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 126
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 406
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.486
Positive Predictive Value 0.720
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_0 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 10
3J2L_3 0.54 0.42 0.71 22 7844 11 1 8 2 31
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 15 2 8 5 30
3J3E_7 0.61 0.54 0.69 29 7098 13 2 11 0 25
3J3F_8 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 12221 26 2 10 14 23
3J3F_7 0.66 0.60 0.73 30 7219 12 1 10 1 20
3J3V_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 35 6982 4 1 3 0 22
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.63 0.74 31 6979 11 2 9 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.21 0.46 11 14172 13 2 11 0 41
3ZND_W 0.37 0.35 0.40 8 2983 15 2 10 3 15
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.44 0.70 14 3466 6 2 4 0 18

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 259
Total TN 119641
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 531
Total Scores
MCC 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.379
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.