CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.638 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.085 > 0.583 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.770 > 0.714
Total TP 860 > 805
Total TN 1258023 > 1258012
Total FP 313 < 364
Total FP CONTRA 35 > 28
Total FP INCONS 222 < 295
Total FP COMP 56 > 41
Total FN 767 < 822
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 860
Total TN 1258023
Total FP 313
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 222
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 767
Total Scores
MCC 0.638
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.67 0.58 0.77 366 1116289 118 14 96 8 267
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3J3E_7 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 2 5 0 22
3J3E_8 0.16 0.09 0.27 3 7492 14 1 7 6 30
3J3F_7 0.78 0.70 0.88 35 7220 6 2 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 18 1 7 10 24
3J3V_B 0.56 0.46 0.70 26 6984 11 1 10 0 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W1K_J 0.84 0.76 0.94 29 4155 2 1 1 0 9
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
3ZND_W 0.44 0.39 0.50 9 2985 11 0 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17
4JF2_A 0.44 0.32 0.63 10 2834 6 0 6 0 21

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 805
Total TN 1258012
Total FP 364
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 295
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 822
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.583 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_2 0.61 0.52 0.72 329 1116306 135 8 122 5 304
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.84 0.74 0.96 23 2826 1 1 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.