CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.685 > 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.102 > 0.519 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.556 > 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.852 > 0.634
Total TP 385 > 282
Total TN 64766 < 64773
Total FP 77 < 174
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 14
Total FP INCONS 55 < 149
Total FP COMP 10 < 11
Total FN 308 < 411
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 385
Total TN 64766
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.685
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.852
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 859 2 0 2 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.46 0.68 13 2907 7 0 6 1 15
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.56 0.44 0.74 14 3467 5 4 1 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 3629 3 0 2 1 13
3AKZ_H 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2680 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3GX2_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 24 4342 6 0 5 1 16
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 282
Total TN 64773
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 149
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.519 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3462 21 1 20 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.