CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.638 > 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.085 > 0.403 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.379
Positive Predictive Value 0.770 > 0.444
Total TP 860 > 616
Total TN 1258023 > 1257753
Total FP 313 < 822
Total FP CONTRA 35 < 72
Total FP INCONS 222 < 699
Total FP COMP 56 > 51
Total FN 767 < 1011
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 860
Total TN 1258023
Total FP 313
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 222
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 767
Total Scores
MCC 0.638
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.67 0.58 0.77 366 1116289 118 14 96 8 267
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3J3E_7 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 2 5 0 22
3J3E_8 0.16 0.09 0.27 3 7492 14 1 7 6 30
3J3F_7 0.78 0.70 0.88 35 7220 6 2 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 18 1 7 10 24
3J3V_B 0.56 0.46 0.70 26 6984 11 1 10 0 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W1K_J 0.84 0.76 0.94 29 4155 2 1 1 0 9
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
3ZND_W 0.44 0.39 0.50 9 2985 11 0 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17
4JF2_A 0.44 0.32 0.63 10 2834 6 0 6 0 21

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 616
Total TN 1257753
Total FP 822
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 699
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 1011
Total Scores
MCC 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.379
Positive Predictive Value 0.444
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.