CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Afold
MCC 0.528 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.163 < 0.534 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.350 < 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.800 > 0.572
Total TP 260 < 342
Total TN 173747 > 173474
Total FP 88 < 326
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 41
Total FP INCONS 52 < 215
Total FP COMP 23 < 70
Total FN 483 > 401
P-value 3.13260312532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 260
Total TN 173747
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 483
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.350
Positive Predictive Value 0.800
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
3A2K_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2906 3 0 3 0 11
3G4S_9 0.48 0.32 0.75 18 7357 8 1 5 2 39
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70876 0 0 0 0 132
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_3 0.56 0.56 0.58 15 6302 23 1 10 12 12
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.30 0.24 0.39 11 6993 18 1 16 1 35
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 173474
Total FP 326
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 215
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 401
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.