CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) MCFold
MCC 0.562 > 0.402
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.123 > 0.402 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.396 < 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.804 > 0.393
Total TP 454 < 480
Total TN 184546 > 183889
Total FP 139 < 829
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 102
Total FP INCONS 94 < 640
Total FP COMP 28 < 87
Total FN 693 > 667
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 454
Total TN 184546
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 693
Total Scores
MCC 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.396
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2906 3 0 3 0 11
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3GX2_A 0.39 0.28 0.55 11 4351 10 0 9 1 29
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 7099 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3J3F_7 0.72 0.64 0.82 32 7221 8 0 7 1 18
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_3 0.56 0.56 0.58 15 6302 23 1 10 12 12
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZND_W -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2988 16 3 12 1 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 183889
Total FP 829
Total FP CONTRA 102
Total FP INCONS 640
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 667
Total Scores
MCC 0.402
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.402 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.393
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 1 0 0 1 1
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.