CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.538 > 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.447 ± 0.155 < 0.527 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.385 < 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.642
Total TP 262 < 306
Total TN 98762 > 98631
Total FP 92 < 195
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 18
Total FP INCONS 78 < 153
Total FP COMP 8 < 24
Total FN 419 > 375
P-value 0.290704005595

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 98762
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 419
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.447 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 7099 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_7 0.72 0.64 0.82 32 7221 8 0 7 1 18
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
3ZND_W -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2988 16 3 12 1 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 98631
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 375
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.