CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.534 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.100 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.455 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.633 < 0.689
Total TP 439 > 31
Total TN 137435 < 138084
Total FP 307 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 0
Total FP INCONS 230 > 14
Total FP COMP 52 < 61
Total FN 526 < 934
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 439
Total TN 137435
Total FP 307
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 230
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 526
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.47 0.43 0.52 12 2752 11 1 10 0 16
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7478 32 2 21 9 31
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.32 0.31 0.33 11 12213 36 3 19 14 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 31 4722 1 0 0 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.27 0.64 14 14174 16 2 6 8 38
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.61 0.79 30 6983 8 1 7 0 19
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.30 0.22 0.41 7 3469 10 1 9 0 25
4FRN_A 0.45 0.36 0.57 13 5128 10 2 8 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.