CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.565 > 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.117 > 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.488 > 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.659 < 0.825
Total TP 413 > 207
Total TN 137977 < 138353
Total FP 259 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 41 > 6
Total FP INCONS 173 > 38
Total FP COMP 45 > 7
Total FN 433 < 639
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 413
Total TN 137977
Total FP 259
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 173
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 433
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.488
Positive Predictive Value 0.659
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7479 36 3 21 12 33
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 38 4 22 12 25
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.19 7 12210 33 8 21 4 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.81 0.67 0.97 31 6989 4 1 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 40 12834 9 0 6 3 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3W1K_J 0.78 0.63 0.96 24 4161 1 1 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.21 0.34 11 14164 24 2 19 3 41
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 20 5130 1 1 0 0 16
4JF2_A 0.83 0.81 0.86 25 2821 4 3 1 0 6

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 207
Total TN 138353
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 639
Total Scores
MCC 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W1K_J 0.43 0.21 0.89 8 4177 1 0 1 0 30
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22
4JF2_A 0.51 0.29 0.90 9 2840 2 0 1 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.