CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.524 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.106 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.448 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 < 0.689
Total TP 432 > 31
Total TN 137431 < 138084
Total FP 307 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 0
Total FP INCONS 239 > 14
Total FP COMP 41 < 61
Total FN 533 < 934
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 432
Total TN 137431
Total FP 307
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 239
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 533
Total Scores
MCC 0.524
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7479 36 3 21 12 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7223 29 1 28 0 42
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 38 4 22 12 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
3W1K_J 0.78 0.63 0.96 24 4161 1 1 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.21 0.34 11 14164 24 2 19 3 41
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.53 0.90 26 6992 3 1 2 0 23
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 20 5130 1 1 0 0 16
4JF2_A 0.83 0.81 0.86 25 2821 4 3 1 0 6

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.