CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.534 > 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.121 > 0.492 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.449 > 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 > 0.559
Total TP 306 > 279
Total TN 98631 > 98609
Total FP 195 < 248
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 21
Total FP INCONS 153 < 199
Total FP COMP 24 < 28
Total FN 375 < 402
P-value 3.36130997681e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 98631
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 375
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 279
Total TN 98609
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 402
Total Scores
MCC 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.559
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.