CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.556 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225 < 0.536 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.432 > 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.720
Total TP 159 > 154
Total TN 50457 < 50463
Total FP 63 < 65
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 10
Total FP INCONS 49 < 50
Total FP COMP 2 < 5
Total FN 209 < 214
P-value 0.0325256581203

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 50457
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 154
Total TN 50463
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 214
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.720
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.