CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) ContextFold
MCC 0.533 > 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.286 < 0.490 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.411 > 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.698 > 0.620
Total TP 120 > 119
Total TN 44378 > 44358
Total FP 54 < 90
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 17
Total FP INCONS 41 < 56
Total FP COMP 2 < 17
Total FN 172 < 173
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 44378
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.533
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.286
Sensitivity 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 119
Total TN 44358
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.490 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.620
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3W1K_J 0.81 0.71 0.93 27 4157 2 1 1 0 11
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.