CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Fold
MCC 0.556 > 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225 > 0.496 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.432 < 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.593
Total TP 159 < 160
Total TN 50457 > 50407
Total FP 63 < 132
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 14
Total FP INCONS 49 < 96
Total FP COMP 2 < 22
Total FN 209 > 208
P-value 1.24019667966e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 50457
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 50407
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 208
Total Scores
MCC 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.593
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.