CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.556 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225 < 0.563 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.432 < 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.637
Total TP 159 < 170
Total TN 50457 > 50410
Total FP 63 < 115
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 10
Total FP INCONS 49 < 87
Total FP COMP 2 < 18
Total FN 209 > 198
P-value 0.00137673878406

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 50457
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 170
Total TN 50410
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 87
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.563 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.637
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 29 2 19 8 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.55 0.48 0.63 19 4723 12 1 10 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.23 0.21 0.25 11 14152 41 1 32 8 41
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.