CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.556 > 0.374
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225 > 0.403 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.432 > 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.410
Total TP 159 > 128
Total TN 50457 > 50365
Total FP 63 < 195
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 20
Total FP INCONS 49 < 164
Total FP COMP 2 < 11
Total FN 209 < 240
P-value 2.3765112512e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 50457
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 50365
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 164
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 240
Total Scores
MCC 0.374
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.410
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.