CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Sfold
MCC 0.556 > 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225 < 0.559 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.432 < 0.446
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.701
Total TP 159 < 164
Total TN 50457 > 50443
Total FP 63 < 94
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 10
Total FP INCONS 49 < 60
Total FP COMP 2 < 24
Total FN 209 > 204
P-value 0.0300471658456

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Sfold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 50457
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 164
Total TN 50443
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 204
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.446
Positive Predictive Value 0.701
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 32 2 22 8 31
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.57 0.53 0.64 21 4720 13 1 11 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.63 0.44 0.89 16 5133 2 2 0 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.