CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.606 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.142 > 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.456 > 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.809 > 0.748
Total TP 203 > 163
Total TN 67929 < 67962
Total FP 61 = 61
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 4
Total FP INCONS 46 < 51
Total FP COMP 13 > 6
Total FN 242 < 282
P-value 7.68522644707e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 203
Total TN 67929
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 242
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.809
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.58 0.47 0.74 14 2831 5 0 5 0 16
3J2L_3 0.69 0.49 0.96 26 7848 3 0 1 2 27
3J3D_C 0.78 0.64 0.95 18 2756 1 0 1 0 10
3J3E_8 0.24 0.15 0.38 5 7490 13 1 7 5 28
3J3E_7 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
3J3F_8 0.48 0.36 0.65 13 12226 10 0 7 3 23
3J3F_7 0.69 0.50 0.96 25 7234 1 0 1 0 25
3J3V_B 0.63 0.40 1.00 23 6998 0 0 0 0 34
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 4 3470 12 1 11 0 28

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.