CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.290 > 0.039
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.315 ± 0.092 > 0.010 ± 0.021
Sensitivity 0.301 > 0.004
Positive Predictive Value 0.288 < 0.375
Total TP 214 > 3
Total TN 104134 < 104868
Total FP 566 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 64 > 0
Total FP INCONS 464 > 5
Total FP COMP 38 > 0
Total FN 498 < 709
P-value 3.18846395401e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 104134
Total FP 566
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 464
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 498
Total Scores
MCC 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.315 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.301
Positive Predictive Value 0.288
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3J20_1 0.41 0.48 0.37 11 2896 19 5 14 0 12
3J2L_3 0.11 0.11 0.12 6 7824 46 3 42 1 47
3J3D_C 0.70 0.71 0.69 20 2746 9 2 7 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7466 47 6 31 10 33
3J3E_7 0.35 0.33 0.37 18 7091 31 1 30 0 36
3J3F_8 0.27 0.33 0.22 12 12192 54 9 33 12 24
3J3F_7 0.17 0.18 0.17 9 7208 43 3 40 0 41
3J3V_B 0.24 0.23 0.27 13 6973 35 1 34 0 44
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
3W3S_B 0.17 0.18 0.18 7 4713 34 1 32 1 33
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.27 0.27 13 6972 36 1 35 0 36
3ZND_W 0.18 0.22 0.17 5 2973 29 6 19 4 18
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8
4JF2_A 0.51 0.55 0.49 17 2815 18 5 13 0 14

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3
Total TN 104868
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 709
Total Scores
MCC 0.039
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.010 ± 0.021
Sensitivity 0.004
Positive Predictive Value 0.375
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3V_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 57
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4JF2_A 0.19 0.10 0.38 3 2842 5 0 5 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.