CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder RDfolder
MCC 0.425 > 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.144 > 0.426 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.316
Positive Predictive Value 0.437 < 0.519
Total TP 90 > 67
Total TN 19402 < 19479
Total FP 119 > 63
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 4
Total FP INCONS 107 > 58
Total FP COMP 3 > 1
Total FN 122 < 145
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 19402
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 107
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.437
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3J3D_C 0.70 0.71 0.69 20 2746 9 2 7 0 8
3W3S_B 0.17 0.18 0.18 7 4713 34 1 32 1 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ATO_G - 0.61 0.70 0.54 7 515 6 2 4 0 3
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8
4JRC_A - 0.48 0.48 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 12

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 67
Total TN 19479
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.426 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.316
Positive Predictive Value 0.519
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 1525 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.