Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of UNAFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_2.0(20) |
|
UNAFold |
|---|
| MCC |
0.647 |
>
|
0.549 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
>
|
0.549
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.509 |
>
|
0.439 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
>
|
0.694 |
| Total TP |
29 |
>
|
25 |
| Total TN |
6986 |
>
|
6985 |
| Total FP |
6 |
<
|
11 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
=
|
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
5 |
<
|
10 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
=
|
0 |
| Total FN |
28 |
<
|
32 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and UNAFold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and UNAFold).
Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
29 |
| Total TN |
6986 |
| Total FP |
6 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
5 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
| Total FN |
28 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.647 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.509 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of UNAFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
25 |
| Total TN |
6985 |
| Total FP |
11 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
10 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
| Total FN |
32 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.549 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.549
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.439 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.694 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
