CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.649 > 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114 > 0.602 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.530 > 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.798 > 0.767
Total TP 364 > 343
Total TN 110739 < 110748
Total FP 120 < 148
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 16
Total FP INCONS 88 = 88
Total FP COMP 28 < 44
Total FN 323 < 344
P-value 2.26346675981e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 364
Total TN 110739
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 323
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.798
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 110748
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 344
Total Scores
MCC 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3V_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 33 6988 0 0 0 0 24
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.