CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.449 > 0.407
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.464 ± 0.188 > 0.419 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.342 > 0.195
Positive Predictive Value 0.595 < 0.852
Total TP 91 > 52
Total TN 56031 < 56123
Total FP 85 > 12
Total FP CONTRA 1 > 0
Total FP INCONS 61 > 9
Total FP COMP 23 > 3
Total FN 175 < 214
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 56031
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.464 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 52
Total TN 56123
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 214
Total Scores
MCC 0.407
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.419 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.195
Positive Predictive Value 0.852
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.