CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Pknots
MCC 0.649 > 0.381
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114 > 0.432 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.530 > 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.798 > 0.431
Total TP 364 > 235
Total TN 110739 > 110650
Total FP 120 < 356
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 20
Total FP INCONS 88 < 290
Total FP COMP 28 < 46
Total FN 323 < 452
P-value 3.05041766982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 364
Total TN 110739
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 323
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.798
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 235
Total TN 110650
Total FP 356
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 290
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 452
Total Scores
MCC 0.381
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.432 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.431
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.62 0.51 0.75 27 7839 12 0 9 3 26
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7479 33 2 20 11 31
3J3E_7 0.43 0.35 0.54 19 7105 16 1 15 0 35
3J3F_7 0.27 0.24 0.32 12 7222 27 1 25 1 38
3J3F_8 0.36 0.36 0.37 13 12211 34 2 20 12 23
3J3V_B 0.41 0.33 0.51 19 6984 18 1 17 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.27 0.24 0.30 12 6981 28 0 28 0 37
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.