CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.649 > 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.122 > 0.606 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.532 > 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 > 0.737
Total TP 335 > 316
Total TN 103753 > 103745
Total FP 114 < 156
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 10
Total FP INCONS 83 < 103
Total FP COMP 28 < 43
Total FN 295 < 314
P-value 2.59578924681e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 335
Total TN 103753
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 83
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 295
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 316
Total TN 103745
Total FP 156
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 314
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.