CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.675 > 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.156 > 0.521 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.553 > 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.599
Total TP 120 > 100
Total TN 30063 > 30041
Total FP 32 < 77
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 10
Total FP INCONS 23 < 57
Total FP COMP 7 < 10
Total FN 97 < 117
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 30063
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 30041
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.599
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.