CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.715 > 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059 > 0.504 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.602 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.850 > 0.625
Total TP 935 > 679
Total TN 1251685 < 1251698
Total FP 203 < 441
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 35
Total FP INCONS 147 < 373
Total FP COMP 38 > 33
Total FN 617 < 873
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 935
Total TN 1251685
Total FP 203
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 617
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J20_2 0.71 0.61 0.81 388 1116287 97 10 80 7 245
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
3W1K_J 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 679
Total TN 1251698
Total FP 441
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 373
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 873
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_2 0.56 0.48 0.67 303 1116310 158 8 144 6 330
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3V_B 0.47 0.37 0.60 21 6986 14 1 13 0 36
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.