CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.715 > 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059 > 0.506 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.602 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.850 > 0.590
Total TP 935 > 693
Total TN 1251685 > 1251611
Total FP 203 < 534
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 45
Total FP INCONS 147 < 436
Total FP COMP 38 < 53
Total FN 617 < 859
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 935
Total TN 1251685
Total FP 203
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 617
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J20_2 0.71 0.61 0.81 388 1116287 97 10 80 7 245
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
3W1K_J 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 693
Total TN 1251611
Total FP 534
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 436
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 859
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.590
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J20_2 0.50 0.43 0.57 272 1116290 208 11 192 5 361
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7476 37 3 24 10 33
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3F_7 0.76 0.64 0.91 32 7225 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.36 12 12213 35 3 18 14 24
3J3V_B 0.53 0.42 0.67 24 6985 12 1 11 0 33
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 24 1 20 3 18
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22
4FRN_A 0.44 0.36 0.54 13 5127 11 2 9 0 23
4JF2_A 0.80 0.71 0.92 22 2826 2 2 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.