CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.715 > 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059 > 0.393 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.602 > 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.850 > 0.438
Total TP 935 > 581
Total TN 1251685 > 1251457
Total FP 203 < 796
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 74
Total FP INCONS 147 < 673
Total FP COMP 38 < 49
Total FN 617 < 971
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 935
Total TN 1251685
Total FP 203
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 617
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J20_2 0.71 0.61 0.81 388 1116287 97 10 80 7 245
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
3W1K_J 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 581
Total TN 1251457
Total FP 796
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 673
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 971
Total Scores
MCC 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.393 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.438
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.