CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.645 > 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.092 > 0.501 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.511 > 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.616
Total TP 211 > 172
Total TN 73307 > 73286
Total FP 65 < 143
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 15
Total FP INCONS 41 < 92
Total FP COMP 18 < 36
Total FN 202 < 241
P-value 2.08252958266e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 211
Total TN 73307
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 202
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3W1K_J 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 73286
Total FP 143
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 241
Total Scores
MCC 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.