CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.729 > 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.065 > 0.433 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.606 > 0.345
Positive Predictive Value 0.882 > 0.479
Total TP 502 > 286
Total TN 117069 > 117041
Total FP 93 < 349
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 29
Total FP INCONS 61 < 282
Total FP COMP 26 < 38
Total FN 327 < 543
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 117069
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 327
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.882
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 286
Total TN 117041
Total FP 349
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 282
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 543
Total Scores
MCC 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.433 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.345
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.47 0.37 0.61 20 7107 13 0 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 1 24 0 41
3J3V_B 0.16 0.12 0.21 7 6988 26 1 25 0 50
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32
4JF2_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 24 2824 2 1 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.