CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.678 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.173 > 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.554 > 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.751
Total TP 215 > 151
Total TN 60901 < 60958
Total FP 57 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 4
Total FP INCONS 43 < 46
Total FP COMP 14 > 6
Total FN 173 < 237
P-value 1.39551335374e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 215
Total TN 60901
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 13 0 10 3 30
3J3E_7 0.74 0.61 0.89 33 7103 4 0 4 0 21
3J3F_8 0.33 0.25 0.43 9 12225 18 0 12 6 27
3J3F_7 0.80 0.68 0.94 34 7224 3 0 2 1 16
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.56 0.95 18 3467 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 151
Total TN 60958
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 237
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.