CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.663 > 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.107 > 0.491 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.528 > 0.400
Positive Predictive Value 0.836 > 0.568
Total TP 387 > 293
Total TN 112841 > 112788
Total FP 98 < 251
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 22
Total FP INCONS 76 < 201
Total FP COMP 22 < 28
Total FN 346 < 440
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 387
Total TN 112841
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 346
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.836
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_7 0.74 0.61 0.89 33 7103 4 0 4 0 21
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 13 0 10 3 30
3J3F_7 0.80 0.68 0.94 34 7224 3 0 2 1 16
3J3F_8 0.33 0.25 0.43 9 12225 18 0 12 6 27
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11
4FRG_B 0.73 0.56 0.95 18 3467 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 293
Total TN 112788
Total FP 251
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 201
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.400
Positive Predictive Value 0.568
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.