CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.509 > 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.164 > 0.435 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.371 > 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.702 < 0.843
Total TP 127 > 75
Total TN 62130 < 62222
Total FP 70 > 17
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 1
Total FP INCONS 54 > 13
Total FP COMP 16 > 3
Total FN 215 < 267
P-value 1.31583660336e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 62130
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 215
Total Scores
MCC 0.509
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.371
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 13 0 10 3 30
3J3F_8 0.33 0.25 0.43 9 12225 18 0 12 6 27
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11
4FRG_B 0.73 0.56 0.95 18 3467 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 62222
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 267
Total Scores
MCC 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.435 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.