CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.531 > 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.167 > 0.504 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.393 = 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.722 > 0.601
Total TP 143 = 143
Total TN 65767 > 65727
Total FP 71 < 131
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 12
Total FP INCONS 55 < 83
Total FP COMP 16 < 36
Total FN 221 = 221
P-value 1.45096400029e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 65767
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.722
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 13 0 10 3 30
3J3F_8 0.33 0.25 0.43 9 12225 18 0 12 6 27
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 65727
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 83
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.601
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.