CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.663 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.107 > 0.482 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.528 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.836 > 0.561
Total TP 387 > 313
Total TN 112841 > 112746
Total FP 98 < 301
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 21
Total FP INCONS 76 < 224
Total FP COMP 22 < 56
Total FN 346 < 420
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 387
Total TN 112841
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 346
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.836
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_7 0.74 0.61 0.89 33 7103 4 0 4 0 21
3J3E_8 0.14 0.09 0.23 3 7490 13 0 10 3 30
3J3F_7 0.80 0.68 0.94 34 7224 3 0 2 1 16
3J3F_8 0.33 0.25 0.43 9 12225 18 0 12 6 27
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11
4FRG_B 0.73 0.56 0.95 18 3467 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 313
Total TN 112746
Total FP 301
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 224
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 420
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.482 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.561
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3F_7 0.73 0.62 0.86 31 7224 6 0 5 1 19
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.21 5 2979 20 1 18 1 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.