CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.526 > 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.120 > 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.478 > 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.585 < 0.825
Total TP 404 > 207
Total TN 137913 < 138353
Total FP 341 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 6
Total FP INCONS 241 > 38
Total FP COMP 54 > 7
Total FN 442 < 639
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 404
Total TN 137913
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 241
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 442
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.585
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.55 16 4342 14 1 12 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7479 33 2 20 11 31
3J3F_8 0.36 0.36 0.37 13 12211 34 2 20 12 23
3JYX_4 0.18 0.21 0.16 7 12203 41 13 23 5 26
3LA5_A 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 2463 0 0 0 0 12
3NPB_A 0.76 0.67 0.86 31 6985 8 1 4 3 15
3O58_3 0.27 0.31 0.24 11 12357 38 11 24 3 24
3PDR_A 0.54 0.44 0.65 32 12831 19 0 17 2 40
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.71 0.63 0.81 25 4722 7 0 6 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20
4FRN_A 0.51 0.42 0.63 15 5127 9 1 8 0 21
4JF2_A 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 2822 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 207
Total TN 138353
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 639
Total Scores
MCC 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W1K_J 0.43 0.21 0.89 8 4177 1 0 1 0 30
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22
4JF2_A 0.51 0.29 0.90 9 2840 2 0 1 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.