CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.488 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.111 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.556 < 0.689
Total TP 419 > 31
Total TN 137375 < 138084
Total FP 384 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 0
Total FP INCONS 310 > 14
Total FP COMP 49 < 61
Total FN 546 < 934
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 419
Total TN 137375
Total FP 384
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 310
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 546
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.556
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.62 0.51 0.75 27 7839 12 0 9 3 26
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7479 33 2 20 11 31
3J3E_7 0.43 0.35 0.54 19 7105 16 1 15 0 35
3J3F_7 0.27 0.24 0.32 12 7222 27 1 25 1 38
3J3F_8 0.36 0.36 0.37 13 12211 34 2 20 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.71 0.63 0.81 25 4722 7 0 6 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
3ZEX_D 0.27 0.24 0.30 12 6981 28 0 28 0 37
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20
4FRN_A 0.51 0.42 0.63 15 5127 9 1 8 0 21
4JF2_A 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 2822 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.