CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG Fold
MCC 0.488 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.064 > 0.494 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.435 > 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.549 > 0.518
Total TP 1327 > 1242
Total TN 1616415 < 1616432
Total FP 1194 < 1270
Total FP CONTRA 142 > 126
Total FP INCONS 947 < 1031
Total FP COMP 105 < 113
Total FN 1727 < 1812
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and Fold).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1327
Total TN 1616415
Total FP 1194
Total FP CONTRA 142
Total FP INCONS 947
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 1727
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.549
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.72 0.60 0.86 24 5123 8 2 2 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.63 0.55 0.73 11 1525 4 1 3 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.73 0.69 0.77 27 6070 8 2 6 0 12
2M58_A - 0.81 0.71 0.92 12 1640 1 1 0 0 5
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.33 0.32 0.36 12 4153 21 0 21 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2676 14 4 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.33 0.28 31 60617 80 24 54 2 63
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.55 62 70763 52 10 41 1 70
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.67 28 6861 14 1 13 0 26
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 6183 27 2 23 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.51 0.71 32 10251 14 0 13 1 31
3J2C_M - 0.50 0.41 0.61 85 106351 58 9 46 3 122
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 30 2 19 9 28
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 1 10 0 28
3J3F_8 0.31 0.31 0.31 11 12211 37 4 20 13 25
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.83 0.72 0.97 33 6987 3 0 1 2 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3O58_2 0.59 0.61 0.58 23 7220 19 4 13 2 15
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.58 0.53 0.66 21 4721 12 1 10 1 19
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 4 49 2 77
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 43 1 27 15 41
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_B - 0.30 0.27 0.34 152 1071927 311 34 267 10 406
3ZEX_G - 0.56 0.46 0.68 34 16421 21 1 15 5 40
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.73 0.70 0.78 7 519 2 1 1 0 3
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.77 0.71 0.85 22 2824 4 3 1 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1242
Total TN 1616432
Total FP 1270
Total FP CONTRA 126
Total FP INCONS 1031
Total FP COMP 113
Total FN 1812
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.518
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.79 0.91 31 6071 5 0 3 2 8
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1638 15 0 15 0 17
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.20 0.19 0.23 3 1115 10 2 8 0 13
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.59 0.54 0.65 34 10244 18 1 17 0 29
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.15 0.23 32 106350 110 5 104 1 175
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.47 0.43 0.52 12 2752 11 1 10 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.57 20 7105 15 1 14 0 34
3J3F_8 0.28 0.28 0.29 10 12211 39 5 20 14 26
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.51 0.42 0.63 24 6983 14 1 13 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21890 57 2 53 2 77
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.19 7 9008 30 5 25 0 31
3ZEX_B - 0.27 0.24 0.30 135 1071923 334 34 288 12 423
3ZEX_G - 0.76 0.65 0.89 48 16417 12 0 6 6 26
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.