CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.484 > 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.159 > 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.440 > 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.538 < 0.684
Total TP 206 > 160
Total TN 91669 < 91818
Total FP 247 > 107
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 8
Total FP INCONS 152 > 66
Total FP COMP 70 > 33
Total FN 262 < 308
P-value 0.0786965679238

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 206
Total TN 91669
Total FP 247
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 262
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.63 0.55 0.73 11 1525 4 1 3 0 9
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 30 2 19 9 28
3J3F_8 0.31 0.31 0.31 11 12211 37 4 20 13 25
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.32 10 12215 33 5 16 12 23
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3W3S_B 0.58 0.53 0.66 21 4721 12 1 10 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 43 1 27 15 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4JF2_A 0.77 0.71 0.85 22 2824 4 3 1 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 91818
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.